UK Appeal Court uphelds Alex Hepburn rape conviction as the ex expert cricketer who was imprisoned for assaulting a resting lady has had his conviction maintained.

Alex Hepburn, 24, was seen as liable at a retrial in 2019 on charges identifying with an assault at a level in Worcester in 2017 and imprisoned for a long time.

His attorney tested the conviction, contending writings specifying a sexual triumph "game" ought not have been utilized as proof at his preliminary.

On Tuesday, the Court of Appeal denied the offer to upset the conviction.

The Australian-brought into the world previous Worcestershire every single rounder wa saw as liable of oral assault yet freed from a further tally of assault identifying with a similar casualty.

Addressing the BBC's Victoria Derbyshire after Hepburn's conviction, the lady said she had been left with facial loss of motion and post-horrible pressure issue.

In the judgment, three senior appointed authorities, including the Lord Chief Justice Lord Burnett, excused Hepburn's intrigue, saying: "The conviction isn't dangerous."

The assault on 1 April 2017 occurred on the main night of a sexual triumph competiton with his colleagues, which he helped set up on a WhatsApp gathering.

UK Appeal Court uphelds Alex Hepburn rape conviction

Hepburn's preliminary heard he was "started up" by laying down with the most ladies, before completing the assault at his level in Portland Street, Worcester.

During the intrigue hearing, his attorneys contended messages introduced to the jury didn't show that he was happy to engage in sexual relations without assent.

A large number of the messages identified with an opposition between Hepburn his previous partners to increase sexual experiences, the court was told.

Hepburn's counselor, David Emanuel QC, had said the substance of the messages were "excessively far evacuated as to have the option to be to do with the realities of the supposed offense".

Examiner Miranda Moore QC contended it was correct the messages were heard at the preliminary.

She told the court "this wasn't a touch of innocent talk" yet a "profound situated and long-running match-up between various expert athletes".

Imprisoning Hepburn on 30 April a year ago, Judge Jim Tindal told the cricketer he and a previous partner, Joe Clarke, had consented to a "disgraceful chauvinist game to gather however many sexual experiences as could be allowed".

In comments about the WhatsApp gathering, the appointed authority stated: "You most likely idea it was laddish conduct.

"In truth, it was foul sexism."

UK Appeal Court uphelds Alex Hepburn rape conviction


Coronavirus: How those missed off the protecting rundown have fared in lockdown

As the coronavirus episode spread over the UK in the spring, around 2,000,000 individuals with certain wellbeing conditions were encouraged to "shield" - to remain at home and embrace stricter removing measures than most others.

However, in April, BBC News uncovered 600,000 individuals had been left off the administration's "high hazard" register notwithstanding meeting the standards, including transplant patients, individuals with asthma and some with uncommon lung ailments.

The register was being utilized to recognize individuals who ought to be given need for things, for example, store conveyance openings thus, for some, who were passed up a great opportunity, the underlying concerns were tied in with getting essential food and clinical supplies.

A week ago it was declared those protecting in England could meet others outside from 6 July and that protecting was because of end on 1 August. So how have the individuals who were not on the underlying rundown managed lockdown and what kind of help have they gotten?

- 'It was dicey for around 10 days'

Lucy Pearson, from Whitsbury in Fordingbridge, Hampshire, had a heart transplant 14 years back and has no spleen.

"We live five miles from the closest town so it's been troublesome and it truly was dicey for around 10 days," said Bev Pearson, mother of 20-year-old Lucy.

"Neighbors offered to search for us and in spite of the fact that we accepted some assistance we felt abnormal on the grounds that we would not like to put others in danger by taking care of us. I don't care for placing individuals in that position.

"In spite of enlisting her as high hazard toward the beginning of lockdown, we got our first content from the administration on 14 May."

Since week nine of lockdown, Mrs Pearson said her little girl had been accepting a week by week food bundle from the administration and the family had likewise figured out how to book general store conveyance openings after she was added to the protecting rundown.

During week 14, she additionally got her first letter from the administration.

"Fortunately's, everything currently sifted through and a NHS responder in the town gets her drug once per month," Mrs Pearson said.

Miss Pearson depicted her experience of lockdown as baffling and said she felt irritated with individuals who had disrupted lockdown norms.

"I can hardly wait to go out. I truly miss the nearby contact with my Granny and Granddad that we as a whole underestimate.

"I have done heaps of perusing and tuning in to music however."

- 'We have played heaps of Scrabble'

Liz Goldfinch, 79, from Droitwich in Worcestershire, has been protecting with her 88-year-old spouse, Oli, as she has cryptogenic arranging pneumonia (COP) - an uncommon lung condition - and Parkinson's ailment.

"Not long after I included myself to the rundown the administration site, Sainsbury's and Tesco messaged me to reveal to me I had been recognized as high hazard and I've had standard spaces from that point forward," she said.

"Inevitably I got a call from my GP and was told I had at first been missed in light of the fact that my sickness is uncommon and not direct.

"I likewise got a specialist letter. So actually it's completely been fine from that point forward.

"I likewise began getting free food bundles conveyed however I didn't require them so I sent the food to the food bank. It was a decent determination however - enough nourishment for one individual for seven days, a reasonable eating routine."

Mrs Goldfinch said her companion had been conveying her remedies, while her child and neighbors had additionally been "exceptionally useful and minding us normally".

"I feel fortunate that I have Oli with me and I've not been distant from everyone else - it would have been exceptionally troublesome without him," she included.

"I've had the opportunity to prepare some half better than average dinners - I'm not the best cook, we have additionally played heaps of Scrabble, got out the examination, participated in a Zoom test once a fortnight with ex-associates and it's been extremely soothing - somewhat like being on vacation however without having the option to go anyplace."

- 'I didn't get anything - not a content or food, or anything'

Mother-of-four Ruth - who would not like to give her last name - is from Somerset and has serious asthma.

"I am a high hazard asthmatic on fexafenigan, montelucast and steroid inhalers, and am under an advisor at the emergency clinic," the 39-year-old said.

"At the point when I heard nothing from the administration I enlisted on the administration site.

"Since enrolling I have had heard nothing - not a content or food, or anything.

"I've never been approached to shield and never got any help.

"It's been an immense concern particularly as toward the start of lockdown I was amazingly unwell and was put on anti-toxins and steroids.

"I accept this put me at a serious high hazard as I was so open to my insusceptible framework around then."

Ruth said it had been especially troublesome as she has four youngsters and they had been compelled to depend on loved ones for provisions.


This story is brought to you by Worcester Night Life.

Worcester Night Life

Join for FREE